Why We
Baptize in Jesus' Name
The subject of water baptism has long been
called a great issue and no doubt has been made
such by many church leaders of the past and
present. In our study of it, let us first
consider its importance, or the necessity of
being baptized.
The Importance of Water Baptism
Christian water baptism is an ordinance
instituted by Jesus
Christ. If it is not
important in the plan of God, why did Jesus
command it in Matthew 28:19? And why did Peter
follow up by saying, "Be baptized every one of
you," and by commanding the Gentiles to be
baptized (Acts 2:38; 10:48)? We must remember
two points about the importance of water
baptism. First, whatever Christ definitely
established and ordained cannot be unimportant,
whether we understand its significance or not.
Second, Christ and the apostles showed the
importance of this ordinance by observing it.
Jesus walked many miles to be baptized, though
He was without sin, saying, "For thus it becometh us to fulfill all righteousness" (See
Matthew 3:13-16.)
It is true that water itself does not contain
any saving virtue, but God has chosen to include
it in His plan of salvation. Peter explained,
"Baptism doth also now save us (not the putting
away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer
of a good conscience toward God) by the
resurrection of Jesus Christ" (I Peter 3:21).
According to Luke 7:30, "the Pharisees and
lawyers rejected the counsel of God against
themselves, being not baptized."
The Mode of Baptism
According to the Scriptures, the proper mode of
baptism is immersion. "And Jesus, when he was
baptized, went up straightway out of the water"
(Matthew 3:16). "And they went down both into
the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he
baptized him" (Acts 8:38). "Therefore we are
buried with him by baptism into death" (Romans
6:4). A corpse is not buried by placing it on
top of the ground and sprinkling a little soil
on it, but by covering it completely.
According to the World Book Encyclopedia, "At
first all baptism was by complete immersion"
(vol. 1, p.651). And the Catholic Encyclopedia
states, "In the early centuries, all were
baptized by immersion in streams, pools, and
baptisteries" (vol. 2, p.263). Immersion was not
convenient after the Catholic church instituted
infant baptism; thus the mode was changed to
sprinkling. (See Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th
ed., vol. 3, pp.365-66.)
Repentance identifies us with the death of
Christ, and baptism identifies us with His
burial. Coming forth from the watery grave of
baptism and receiving new life in the Holy
Spirit identifies us with His resurrection.
The Formula for Baptism
Jesus commanded His disciples to "teach all
nations, baptizing them in the name of the
Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost"
(Matthew 28:19). He did not command them to use
these words as a formula, but He commanded them
to baptize in "the name." The word name is used
here in the singular, and it is the focal point
of the baptismal command. The titles Father,
Son, and Holy Ghost describe God's relationships
to humanity and are not the supreme, saving name
described here, which is Jesus. "Neither is
there salvation in any other; for there is none
other name under heaven given among men, whereby
we must be saved" (Acts 4:12).
Jesus is the name in which the roles of Father,
Son, and Holy Ghost are revealed. The angel of
the Lord instructed Joseph, "She shall bring
forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS:
for he shall save his people from their sins"
(Matthew 1:21). Jesus said, "I am come in my
Father's name," and, "The Comforter, which is
the Holy Ghost,...the Father will send in my
name" (John 5:43; 14:26). Thus by baptizing in
the name of Jesus, we honor the Godhead. "For in
him dwelleth all the fullness of the Godhead
bodily" (Colossians 2:9).
Luke 24:45-47 records that just before His
ascension, Jesus opened the disciples'
understanding. It was necessary that their
understanding be opened, and many today need
this same operation in order to understand the
Scriptures. Then Jesus said to them, "Thus it is
written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer,
and to rise from the dead the third day." The
disciples had their understanding opened so that
they could grasp the vast importance of the
death, burial, and resurrection of Christ. Verse
47 describes the commission that Jesus then
gave: "And that repentance and remission of sins
should be preached in his name among all nations
[Jews and Gentiles], beginning at Jerusalem."
Peter was one of that number to whom Jesus had
spoken and whose understanding had been opened.
After having listened to these instructions, a
few days later he was inspired by the Holy Ghost
to preach on the Day of Pentecost. The hearts of
the hearers were pierced and, feeling condemned,
they cried out to Peter and the other apostles,
"Men and brethren, what shall we do?" (Acts
2:37). Peter did not hesitate but boldly
answered, "Repent, and be baptized every one of
you in the name of Jesus Christ for the
remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift
of the Holy Ghost" (Acts 2:38). "Then they that
gladly received his word were baptized, and the
same day there were added unto them about three
thousand souls" (Acts 2:41).
Some say that Peter told them to be baptized in
Jesus' name because they were Jews and this
baptism was to make them acknowledge Jesus
Christ. But let us go with Peter to the house of
Cornelius several years later. Cornelius and his
household were Gentiles, yet there again Peter
"commanded them to be baptized in the name of
the Lord" (Acts 10:48). (Most translations
actually say, "In the name of Jesus Christ.") If
Peter was wrong on the Day of Pentecost, he
surely had ample time to be corrected before he
went to the house of Cornelius.
Was Peter wrong on the Day of Pentecost? When
the hearers were prickled in their hearts, they
spoke to Peter and to the rest of the apostles
(Acts 2:37). This included Matthew, who wrote
Matthew 28:19. Moreover, when Peter preached, he
stood up with the eleven Acts 2:14). Matthew was
there, yet we find no words of correction from
him. He surely would have spoken up if Peter had
disobeyed the Lord. But all the apostles
understood and carried out the Lord's
commission. As Jesus said in prayer, "I have
manifested thy name unto the men [the apostles]
which thou gavest me out of the world...and they
have kept thy word" (John 17:6).
The Samaritans, who were not Jews, were also
baptized in the name of Jesus. Then Philip went
down to the city of Samaria, and preached Christ
unto them...."But when they believed Philip
preaching the things concerning the kingdom of
God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were
baptized, both men and women.... They were
baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus" (Acts
8:5, 12, 16).
Let us see how Paul, the apostle to the
Gentiles, baptized. He went to Ephesus many
years after the Day of Pentecost and found some
disciples of John the Baptist there. "He said
unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since
ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not
so much as heard whether there be any Holy
Ghost. And he said unto them, Unto what then
were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's
baptism. Then said Paul, John verily baptized
with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the
people, that they should believe on him which
should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.
When they heard this, they were baptized in the
name of the Lord Jesus" (Acts 19:2-5). Although
these disciples had already been baptized, the
name of Jesus was so important as to cause them
to be rebaptized in His name.
We do not believe that Paul changed the formula
or mode of baptism when he baptized Lydia and
her household (Acts 16:14-15) or the Philippian
jailer. The latter came trembling and fell down
before Paul and Silas, saying, "Sirs, what must
I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the
Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and
thy house. And he took them the same hour of the
night [shortly after midnight], and washed their
stripes; and was baptized, he and all his,
straightway" (Acts 16:30-33). How can we doubt
that Paul baptized these people using the same
mode and formula that he used elsewhere, that
is, immersion in the name of the Lord Jesus
Christ?
Paul was not with the apostles when Jesus gave
his finial instructions to them in Matthew 28:19
and Luke 24:47, yet Paul baptized in the name of
the Lord Jesus. How did he know what to do? He
said that his gospel was not a tradition of men
but a revelation from God. "I certify you,
brethren, that the gospel which was preached of
me is not after man. For I neither received it
of man, neither was I taught it, but by the
revelation of Jesus Christ" (Galatians 1:11-12).
Paul was chosen to bear Jesus' name to the
Gentiles, and he wrote many divinely inspired
epistles to the church. To this apostle, God
revealed the mystery of the church, "which in
other ages was not made known unto the sons of
men, as it now revealed unto his holy apostles
and prophets by the Spirit" (Ephesians 3:5).
Paul claimed to have divine authority: "If any
man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual,
let him acknowledge that the things that I write
unto you are the commandments of the Lord" (I
Corinthians 14:37). And Paul wrote, Whatsoever
ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the
Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father
by him" (Colossians 3:17). Water baptism is done
in both word and deed. We cannot afford to
overlook this command to the church.
The church is "built upon the foundation of the
apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself
being the chief corner stone" (Ephesians 2:20).
The apostles not only preached baptism in Jesus'
name, but they practiced it. Nowhere can we find
that they baptized using the words "in the name
of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy
Ghost." Instead, we find them baptizing in the
name of the Lord Jesus Christ. In baptizing in
Jesus' name, they fulfilled the command of the
Lord in Matthew 28:19. Paul said, "But though
we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other
gospel unto you than that which we have preached
unto you, let him be accursed" (Galatians 1:8).
Let this be a solemn warning to us.
Some say that they will accept the words of
Jesus in Matthew 28:19 but not those of Peter in
Acts 2:38. But Peter spoke on the Day of
Pentecost under the anointing of the Holy Ghost.
Peter was one of the apostles, and to him had
been given the keys of the kingdom, so we have
no right to discredit his words.
In Mark 7:8 Jesus said, "Laying aside the
commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of
men." History tells us that it was not until
many years after the apostles that the mode and
formula of baptism in the name of Jesus Christ
were changed. (See Hastings' Dictionary of the
Bible, vol. 1, p.241.) Which means more to you,
the command of the Lord or the tradition of men?
*Taken from the Word
Aflame Tract "Why We Baptize in Jesus' Name"
#6109.